every pattern costs us JIT time, but not every pattern is doing anything.
especially with the flag rework of 2023-2024, a lot of patterns just don't make
sense anymore. constant folding in particular isn't too useful now.
only instcountci change is AAD which i'm contractually forbidden from caring
about.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
(except for when we explicitly enable AFP).
Since AFP gets saved/restored, we get `msr fpcr` garbage in random instructions
when AFP is enabled. Explicitly disable everywhere since it's not worth our time
to triage which files might hit that path. Fixes instcountci on AFP-supporting
hosts now that we have AFP enabled.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Folds reg+const memory address into addressing mode,
if the constant is within 16Kb.
Update instcountci files.
Add test 32Bit_ASM/FEX_bugs/SubAddrBug.asm
Instruction count CI has transformed the way we work on FEX… I love the system
and want to make it better. there’s one part of instruction count CI that isn’t
so lovable: the problematic “optimal” flag on instructions.
There are several issues with this flag, both philosophical and practical.
– it is tedious to update the optimal flag when making an implementation
optimal. The effect of that is discouraging people from making instructions,
optimal, or encouraging people to fail to update the flag, and dilute the value
of it. Either way, since we care far more about optimal implementations, then we
do about updating the flag, clearly we should prioritize the implementation and
not the flag. This issue was not obvious at the outset, when instruction count,
CI was introduced, and still quite small. The problem magnified when we started
duplicating instructions in bulk for different combinations of CPU features
(flagm, AFP, etc.) that intern multiplies the manual work required to update the
flags by the corresponding constant factor. if it comes down to a choice between
removing this extra coverage and removing the flag, I think we all agree that
removing the flag is the lesser evil.
– The definition of “optimal” is fundamentally problematic. I have often
improved the instruction count of an instruction that was already “optimal”.
This is all kinds of silly, and calls into question whether there’s any value
whatsoever in the existing classifications of the flag. Furthermore, it is often
unknowable, whether an implementation really is optimal. Is it possible to
implement BZHI (with flag calculations) in fewer than eight instructions? We
don’t know, and it’s silly to pretend that we do.
– as a consequence of the problematic definitions , there are so many errors in
both directions that I don’t think there’s much value in preserving the existing
classification at the expense of +progress. Being able to say “32% of
instructions are translated optimally” is neat, but it really doesn’t tell us
anything whatsoever when you dig a little deeper.
So, as the flag is misleading at best and perhaps harmful at worst, let’s remove
it and make the instruction count CI, more useful overall. let’s let the
expected count and the assembly speak for themselves, and cut away the chaff. if
we want a meaningless number to report to management, we can instead calculate
the average blowup factor ;-)
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Simon Scherer