Rather than the context. Effectively a static register allocation scheme for
flags. This will let us optimize out a LOT of flag handling code, keeping things
in NZCV rather than needing to copy between NZCV and memory all the time.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
While tracking issues in #3162, I had encountered a random crash that I
started hunting. It was very quickly apparent that this crash was
unrelated to that PR. I just happened to be running a unittest that was
creating and tearing down a bunch of threads that exacerbated the
problem.
See as follows with the strace output:
```
[pid 269497] munmap(0x7fffde1ff000, 16777216) = 0
[pid 269497] munmap(0x7fffde1ff000, 16777216 <unfinished ...>
[pid 268982] mmap(NULL, 16777216, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fffde1ff000
[pid 269497] <... munmap resumed>) = 0
```
One thread is freeing some memory with munmap, another one then does a mmap and gets the same address back.
Nothing too crazy at initial glance, but taking a closelier look, we can
see that there are two strange oddities:
1) We are double unmapping the same address range through munmap
2) The second munmap is interrupted and returns AFTER the mmap.
This has the unfortunate side-effect that the mmap that just returned
the same address has actually just been unmapped! This was resulting in
spurious crashes around thread creation that was SUPER hard to nail
down.
The problem comes down to how code buffer objects are managed, in
particular how the Arm64Emitter and Dispatcher handled its buffers.
Arm64Emitter is inherited by two classes; Dispatcher, and Arm64JITCore.
On class destruction the emitter would free its internal tracking
buffer. Additionally on destruction, the Arm64JITCore would walk through
all of its CodeBuffers and free them. The problem ends up being that in
the Arm64JITCore, it would free its code buffers which also ended up
being the current active buffer bound to the Arm64Emitter. Thus causing
the Arm64Emitter to come back around and try to free the same buffer
again.
This is a double-free problem! and was only visible on thread exiting!
Can't track double frees with mmap and munmap with current tooling!
This problem typically didn't occur because of how fast the destruction
usually takes and jemalloc inbetween also typically means the problem
doesn't occur. Initially thinking this was a threaded pool allocator bug
because typically the new allocation would end up in there once a new
thread was spinning up.
Now we change behaviour, Arm64Emitter doesn't do any buffer management
itself, instead just passing an initial buffer on to its internal buffer
tracking if given one up front.
This leaves the Dispatcher and the Arm64JITCore to do their buffer
management and ensuring there is no double free.
The day is saved!
This mask was being used incorrectly, it's a GPR spill mask for host
GPRs not an index in to the SRA array. Search the array of SRA registers
for the first one in the mask first to use as a temporary.
Fixes an issue with 32-bit inline syscalls where the first register
being spilled was r8, which was beyond the size of SRA registers on
32-bit processes. This would cause FEX to read the value just after
x32::SRA which is x32::RA. This would mean it would use r20 as a
temporary, corrupting the register in the process.
I noticed this while poking at #3162, but also when I was looking at a
memory buffer ownership problem.
When FEX is in the JIT we need to make sure to enable NEP and AH and
then disable when leaving.
Explicitly disabled when the vixl simulator is used since even
attempting to set the bits will cause it to fault out. Ensures
InstCountCI keeps working.
With the removal of the x86 JIT, there is no need to have these be
independent classes.
Merges the Arm64Dispatcher in to the base Dispatcher class.
No functional change, just moving code.
This leaves us with two temporary vectors that the JIT can use.
As of last month we stopped using v2 and v3 as temporaries and these can
now be given back to the JIT.
Ensures that the registers are still sequentially ordered and adds
support for spilling the FPR counts that are aligned by 2 instead of 4.
Adds a couple of instructions to filling and spilling but isn't that big
of an issue.
InstcountCI has some ridiculously large changes just because RA is
starting at a new register number.
This class is very expensive to initialize so if you happen to have the
disassembler configuration enabled you were eating a very bad
initialization cost for no reason.
Only initialize the data member if any disassembler runtime option is
enabled, this completely removes the overhead.
FEX doesn't use the platform register on wine platforms so there is no
reason to save and restore it.
On Linux we can still use it at some point but for now it isn't part of
our RA.
It is not an external component, and it makes paths needlessly long.
Ryan seemed amenable to this when we discussed on IRC earlier.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Alyssa Rosenzweig