mirror of
https://github.com/saphid/frame-control.git
synced 2026-10-06 05:02:50 +02:00
Contact email: follow-up given with a report is kept and removable; match by rev
- Ticking follow-up questions on a report makes that address the contact email (follow-up ticked, update choice unchanged), so Settings shows it and Remove my email withdraws it like any other. - Reports carry contact_rev; the inbox takes a report's follow-up permission back when a later change from that copy (higher rev) no longer agrees, whatever the clocks say. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
01d5c612c0
commit
08d75e3ffb
6 files changed
+117
-75
No files matched your search
+64
-41
@@ -249,69 +249,92 @@ class Contact(Base):
|
||||
|
||||
# ---- reports and the maintainer's list
|
||||
|
||||
def reports(self):
|
||||
return [e["properties"] for e in self.events() if e["event"] == "problem_report"]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_report_carries_the_address_only_with_follow_up_consent(self):
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "me@example.com"})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fc.FILE.exists()) # no follow-up: nothing kept, nothing linked
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "me@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
without, with_ = (e["properties"] for e in self.events())
|
||||
self.assertEqual((without["contact"], without["contact_followup"]), ("", False))
|
||||
without, with_ = self.reports()
|
||||
self.assertEqual((without["contact"], without["contact_followup"], without["contact_id"]), ("", False, ""))
|
||||
self.assertEqual((with_["contact"], with_["contact_followup"]), ("me@example.com", True))
|
||||
self.assertEqual((with_["contact_id"], with_["contact_rev"]), (fc.load()["id"], fc.load()["rev"]))
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(with_["contact_id"], tm.settings()["id"]) # not the analytics id
|
||||
with self.assertRaisesRegex(ValueError, "email address"):
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "discord:me", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_report_with_follow_up_carries_the_kept_contact_id(self):
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "me@example.com"})
|
||||
self.assertFalse(fc.FILE.exists()) # no follow-up, nothing kept or linked
|
||||
def test_follow_up_given_with_a_report_is_kept_and_removed_in_settings(self):
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "me@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
without, with_ = (e["properties"] for e in self.events())
|
||||
self.assertEqual(without["contact_id"], "")
|
||||
self.assertEqual(with_["contact_id"], fc.load()["id"])
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(with_["contact_id"], tm.settings()["id"]) # not the analytics id
|
||||
fc.save({"email": "me@example.com", "updates": True})
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.events()[-1]["distinct_id"], with_["contact_id"]) # same copy, same id
|
||||
s = fc.state()
|
||||
self.assertEqual((s["email"], s["updates"], s["followup"]), ("me@example.com", False, True))
|
||||
consent = [e for e in self.events() if e["event"] == "contact_consent"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual([(e["properties"]["action"], e["properties"]["rev"]) for e in consent], [("set", 1)])
|
||||
self.assertEqual(consent[0]["distinct_id"], self.reports()[0]["contact_id"])
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "ME@example.com", "contactFollowup": True}) # already agreed
|
||||
self.assertEqual(len([e for e in self.events() if e["event"] == "contact_consent"]), 1)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.reports()[1]["contact_rev"], 1)
|
||||
fc.save({"email": ""}) # Remove my email
|
||||
last = self.events()[-1]
|
||||
self.assertEqual((last["properties"]["action"], last["properties"]["email"], last["properties"]["rev"]),
|
||||
("withdraw", "", 2))
|
||||
logged = [e["properties"].get("contact") for e in tm._read_lines(tm.SENT) if e["event"] == "problem_report"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(logged, ["<removed>", "<removed>"])
|
||||
|
||||
def report_row(self, ts, contact="me@example.com", followup=True, cid="copy"):
|
||||
return [ts, "AB12CD34", "bug", "RDP", "It never connects.", contact, "0.4.0", "Windows", "", "", followup, cid]
|
||||
def test_a_report_to_another_address_keeps_the_update_choice(self):
|
||||
fc.save({"email": "old@example.com", "updates": True})
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "new@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
s = fc.state()
|
||||
self.assertEqual((s["email"], s["updates"], s["followup"]), ("new@example.com", True, True))
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.reports()[0]["contact_rev"], 2)
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_later_withdrawal_takes_back_a_reports_follow_up_permission(self):
|
||||
reports = [self.report_row("2026-09-10T10:00:00Z"), # removed later
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-12T10:00:00Z", cid="other"), # another copy
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-20T10:00:00Z"), # after the withdrawal
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-11T10:00:00Z", cid="", followup=True), # sent before contact_id
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-15T10:00:00Z", cid="same-second")]
|
||||
consents = [["copy", "me@example.com", True, 1, "2026-09-01T10:00:00Z"],
|
||||
["copy", "", False, 2, "2026-09-14T10:00:00Z"],
|
||||
["other", "me@example.com", True, 1, "2026-09-13T10:00:00Z"], # still agrees
|
||||
["same-second", "", False, 1, "2026-09-15T10:00:00Z"], ["short"]]
|
||||
def report_row(self, contact="me@example.com", followup=True, cid="copy", rev=1):
|
||||
return ["2026-09-10T10:00:00Z", "AB12CD34", "bug", "RDP", "It never connects.", contact,
|
||||
"0.4.0", "Windows", "", "", followup, cid, rev]
|
||||
|
||||
def test_a_later_change_takes_back_a_reports_follow_up_permission(self):
|
||||
reports = [self.report_row(), # removed later
|
||||
self.report_row(cid="other"), # another copy, still agrees
|
||||
self.report_row(rev=3), # sent after the removal
|
||||
self.report_row(cid="moved"), # address changed later
|
||||
self.report_row(cid="news-only"), # follow-up unticked later
|
||||
self.report_row(contact="Me@Example.com", cid="case"), # same address, any case
|
||||
self.report_row(cid="", followup=True), # no contact id: left alone
|
||||
self.report_row(cid="bad", rev="x")] # malformed rev: treated as 0
|
||||
consents = [["copy", "me@example.com", True, 1], ["copy", "", False, 2],
|
||||
["other", "me@example.com", True, 1], ["other", "me@example.com", True, 2],
|
||||
["moved", "new@example.com", True, 2], ["news-only", "me@example.com", False, 2],
|
||||
["case", "me@example.com", True, 2], ["bad", "", False, 1], ["short"], ["x", "", False, "?"]]
|
||||
fr.mark_withdrawn(reports, consents)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([r[10] for r in reports], ["withdrawn", True, True, True, "withdrawn"])
|
||||
self.assertEqual([r[10] for r in reports],
|
||||
["withdrawn", True, True, "withdrawn", "withdrawn", True, True, "withdrawn"])
|
||||
|
||||
def test_changing_the_address_or_unticking_follow_up_takes_it_back_too(self):
|
||||
reports = [self.report_row("2026-09-10T10:00:00Z", cid="moved"),
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-10T10:00:00Z", cid="news-only"),
|
||||
self.report_row("2026-09-10T10:00:00Z", contact="Me@Example.com", cid="case")]
|
||||
consents = [["moved", "new@example.com", True, 1, "2026-09-11T10:00:00Z"],
|
||||
["news-only", "me@example.com", False, 1, "2026-09-11T10:00:00Z"],
|
||||
["case", "me@example.com", True, 1, "2026-09-11T10:00:00Z"],
|
||||
# rev, not the clock, decides which later choice is newest
|
||||
["case", "", False, 2, "2026-09-11T09:59:00Z"]]
|
||||
fr.mark_withdrawn(reports, consents)
|
||||
self.assertEqual([r[10] for r in reports], ["withdrawn", "withdrawn", "withdrawn"])
|
||||
reports[2][10] = True
|
||||
fr.mark_withdrawn(reports[2:], consents[2:3])
|
||||
self.assertIs(reports[2][10], True) # same address, any case, still agrees
|
||||
def test_the_change_number_decides_not_the_clock(self):
|
||||
"""The clock went back between the report and the removal: the removal still counts."""
|
||||
fr.send({**REPORT, "contact": "me@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(fc.time, "gmtime", return_value=time.gmtime(0)):
|
||||
fc.save({"email": ""})
|
||||
report = self.reports()[0]
|
||||
row = self.report_row(cid=report["contact_id"], rev=report["contact_rev"])
|
||||
consents = [[e["distinct_id"], e["properties"]["email"], e["properties"]["followup"], e["properties"]["rev"]]
|
||||
for e in self.events() if e["event"] == "contact_consent"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual(self.events()[-1]["timestamp"], "1970-01-01T00:00:00Z")
|
||||
fr.mark_withdrawn([row], consents)
|
||||
self.assertEqual(row[10], "withdrawn")
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_inbox_shows_withdrawn_follow_up_without_the_address(self):
|
||||
reports = [self.report_row("2026-09-10T10:00:00Z"), ["short"]]
|
||||
consents = [["copy", "", False, 2, "2026-09-14T10:00:00Z"]]
|
||||
reports = [self.report_row(), ["short"]]
|
||||
consents = [["copy", "", False, 2]]
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(db, "_posthog_query", side_effect=[{"results": reports}, {"results": consents}]) as q, \
|
||||
mock.patch.object(sys, "argv", ["frame_report.py", "inbox", "30"]), \
|
||||
mock.patch("builtins.print") as out:
|
||||
fr.main()
|
||||
self.assertIn("properties.contact_rev", q.call_args_list[0].args[0])
|
||||
self.assertIn("event = 'contact_consent'", q.call_args_list[1].args[0])
|
||||
printed = " ".join(str(c.args[0]) for c in out.call_args_list if c.args)
|
||||
self.assertIn("follow-up permission since withdrawn", printed)
|
||||
self.assertNotIn("me@example.com", printed)
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(db, "_posthog_query", return_value={"results": [self.report_row("x", followup=False)]}) as q:
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(db, "_posthog_query", return_value={"results": [self.report_row(followup=False)]}) as q:
|
||||
fr.inbox()
|
||||
self.assertEqual(q.call_count, 1) # nothing to reconcile, no second query
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -391,15 +391,16 @@ class ReportProblem(Base):
|
||||
def test_send_is_a_private_posthog_event_whatever_the_settings(self):
|
||||
got = self.serve()
|
||||
tm.update_settings({"usage": False}) # analytics off: a deliberate report still goes
|
||||
res = fr.send({"kind": "idea", "title": "Live view stops", "message": "It stops after a minute.",
|
||||
"contact": "me@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(fr.frame_contact, "from_report", return_value=("contact-id", 1)): # test_contact
|
||||
res = fr.send({"kind": "idea", "title": "Live view stops", "message": "It stops after a minute.",
|
||||
"contact": "me@example.com", "contactFollowup": True})
|
||||
path, body = got[0]
|
||||
event = body["batch"][0]
|
||||
self.assertEqual((path, body["api_key"], event["event"]), ("/batch/", "phc_test", "problem_report"))
|
||||
props = event["properties"]
|
||||
self.assertEqual((props["kind"], props["title"], props["message"], props["contact"], props["report_id"]),
|
||||
("idea", "Live view stops", "It stops after a minute.", "me@example.com", res["id"]))
|
||||
self.assertIs(props["contact_followup"], True)
|
||||
self.assertEqual((props["contact_followup"], props["contact_id"], props["contact_rev"]), (True, "contact-id", 1))
|
||||
self.assertEqual((props["$process_person_profile"], props["$geoip_disable"]), (False, True))
|
||||
self.assertNotEqual(event["distinct_id"], tm.settings()["id"]) # not linked to the analytics
|
||||
self.assertIn(res["id"], res["message"])
|
||||
@@ -422,8 +423,8 @@ class ReportProblem(Base):
|
||||
|
||||
def test_the_inbox_skips_malformed_reports(self):
|
||||
good = ["2026-09-28T09:50:00Z", "AB12CD34", "bug", "Live view stops", "It stops.", None,
|
||||
"0.4.0", "macOS", "", "", None, None]
|
||||
rows = [["2026-09-28T10:00:00Z", "X", "bug", "Hand-made", None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
|
||||
"0.4.0", "macOS", "", "", None, None, None]
|
||||
rows = [["2026-09-28T10:00:00Z", "X", "bug", "Hand-made", None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None, None],
|
||||
["short"], good]
|
||||
with mock.patch.object(db, "_posthog_query", return_value={"results": rows}), \
|
||||
mock.patch.object(sys, "argv", ["frame_report.py", "inbox"]), \
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user