Files
FEX-Emu--FEX/FEXCore/Source/Interface/Core/Dispatcher
Ryan Houdek 829384e488 JITArm64: Fixes double munmap issue that was causing crashes
While tracking issues in #3162, I had encountered a random crash that I
started hunting. It was very quickly apparent that this crash was
unrelated to that PR. I just happened to be running a unittest that was
creating and tearing down a bunch of threads that exacerbated the
problem.

See as follows with the strace output:
```
[pid 269497] munmap(0x7fffde1ff000, 16777216) = 0
[pid 269497] munmap(0x7fffde1ff000, 16777216 <unfinished ...>
[pid 268982] mmap(NULL, 16777216, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7fffde1ff000
[pid 269497] <... munmap resumed>)      = 0
```

One thread is freeing some memory with munmap, another one then does a mmap and gets the same address back.
Nothing too crazy at initial glance, but taking a closelier look, we can
see that there are two strange oddities:
1) We are double unmapping the same address range through munmap
2) The second munmap is interrupted and returns AFTER the mmap.

This has the unfortunate side-effect that the mmap that just returned
the same address has actually just been unmapped! This was resulting in
spurious crashes around thread creation that was SUPER hard to nail
down.

The problem comes down to how code buffer objects are managed, in
particular how the Arm64Emitter and Dispatcher handled its buffers.

Arm64Emitter is inherited by two classes; Dispatcher, and Arm64JITCore.
On class destruction the emitter would free its internal tracking
buffer. Additionally on destruction, the Arm64JITCore would walk through
all of its CodeBuffers and free them. The problem ends up being that in
the Arm64JITCore, it would free its code buffers which also ended up
being the current active buffer bound to the Arm64Emitter. Thus causing
the Arm64Emitter to come back around and try to free the same buffer
again.

This is a double-free problem! and was only visible on thread exiting!
Can't track double frees with mmap and munmap with current tooling!

This problem typically didn't occur because of how fast the destruction
usually takes and jemalloc inbetween also typically means the problem
doesn't occur. Initially thinking this was a threaded pool allocator bug
because typically the new allocation would end up in there once a new
thread was spinning up.

Now we change behaviour, Arm64Emitter doesn't do any buffer management
itself, instead just passing an initial buffer on to its internal buffer
tracking if given one up front.

This leaves the Dispatcher and the Arm64JITCore to do their buffer
management and ensuring there is no double free.

The day is saved!
2023-11-05 19:18:40 -08:00
..