mirror of
https://github.com/FEX-Emu/FEX.git
synced 2026-10-06 19:00:17 +02:00
Ryan Houdek
1bab28dad4
This thing is a bit intense, so some requirements from the start:
- It needs to be lock-free and thread-safe
- It needs to support contiguous range allocations
- It needs to support allocations larger than a single atomic word
These requirements kind of fly in the face of most bitset allocators
where they will support some parts of these requirements, or just throw
a mutex in front of the whole thing.
Some implementation details:
- If allocating only 1-bit, trivial and always succeeds if there is space
- If allocating <= 64-bit, then always succeeds if there is at least
those many contiguous bits within a single atomic word
- Allocation can fail if there are cross-word contiguous bits of the
size available
- Introduces some sparsity
- If allocating > 64-bits then it falls down the longer scan path.
- Searches for contiguous bits of free space between multiple atomic
words.
- If found, will attempt to allocate tracking which bits were allocated
- If allocation fails, unwind bits already acquired and continue
scanning
Some downsides to this implementation:
- Allocations can fail if sparsity builds up
- Heavily contended allocations can be worse than a lock
- If larger than atomic word allocations are in flight.
- Unwinding larger than word allocations and continuing scanning adds
overhead, a lock would have won at that point.
- A small bit of false sharing where an atomic word is read without
acquire semantics for scanning can technically overlook some
allocations that no longer exist.
- Slower than a linear allocator, but that's not unexpected.
Most of these downsides are okay for our use case, which is code buffer
allocations with the ability to do partial invalidation. If the atomic
bitset fails to fit an allocation, we can throw away the code buffer
like we currently do.
The bitmap allocator that uses this lock-free atomic bitset is still
in-flight but this is one complex container that can land independently.