Noticed an issue where some applications were thinking that applications
were running on a system with 512 CPU cores.
Specifically freedreno/turnip was trying to create 512 worker threads
which would cause my ARM devices to run out of memory.
Looks like sysconf behaviour has changed around this where it is
actually expecting the uint64_t alignment that the Linux kernel does.
So follow that behaviour as well and resolve the issue.
The vast majoirty of syscalls don't need anything in thread or frame.
So lets save an indirection for all those syscalls.
Most of the syscalls which do need Thread (or CTX via
Thread are in Thread.cpp or Memory.cpp
These have all been modifiy to fetch Thread from Frame
Sadly these things can't be split without breaking functionality so it
turns in to a bit of a mess.
SyscallHandler is very much something that is a Linux only construct and
shouldn't be in FEXCore itself. Lets the frontend register a
Syscallhandler with FEXCore. FEXCore itself is then aware of the current
syscall ABI and handles the ABI in an optimal fashion.
So it is not a 100% clean break otherwise we would lose performance.
The SignalDelegator then needs to move to the frontend since the
SyscallHandler requires it for signal based syscalls.
The CPU backend signal handling still needs to happen in FEXCore because
it is a very tight coupling with the CPU backend.
Once we need to support more Signal handling we can give the backends
cleaner support to select which specific OS handler to handle.
Ryan Houdek