This instruction is a little weird.
When accessing memory, the 128-bit operating size of the instruction
only loads 64-bits.
Meanwhile the 256-bit operating size of the instruction fetches a full
256-bits.
Theoretically the hardware could get away with two 64-bit loads or a
wacky 24-byte load, but it looks like to simplify hardware they just
spec'd it that the 256-bit version will always load the full range.
Only installs the tables if SVE256 isn't supported yet AVX is explicitly
enabled with HostFeatures, to protect accidental enablement early.
- Only implements 85 instructions starting out
- Basic vector moves
- Basic vector unary operations
- Basic vector binary operations
- VZeroUpper/VZeroAll
The bulk of the implementation is currently the handling for loading and
storing the halves of the registers from the context or from memory.
This means the load/store helpers must always return a pair unless only
requesting the bottom half of the register, which occurs with 128-bit
AVX operations. The store side then needing to consume the named zero
register if it occurs since those cases will zero the upper bits.
This implementation approach has a few benefits.
- I can pound this out extremely quickly
- SSE implementations are unaffected and don't need to deal with the
insert behaviour of SVE256.
- We still keep the SVE256 implementation for the inevitable future when
hardware vendors actually do implement it (Give it 8 years or
something).
- We can actually unit test this path in CI once it is complete.
- We can partially optimize some paths with SVE128 (Gathers) and support
a full ASIMD path if necessary.
One downside is that I can't enable this in CI yet because it can't pass
all unittests. but that's a non-issue since it is going to be in heavy
flux as I'm hammering out the implementation. It'll get switched on at
the end when it's passing all 1265 AVX unittests. Currently at 1001 on
this.
In quite a few locations we are mixing the case that SVE256 == AVX or
that AVX means the guest register size is 256-bit.
While this is true today, this is entanglement is going to change very
quickly and cause confusion in follow-up PRs.
Now we have SVE128, SVE256, and SVE2 HostFeatures to disambiguate the
different features which mean different things.
This PR keeps the alias that `SupportsAVX` = `SupportsSVE256 && SupportsSVE2`
but that alias is going to very quickly change its definition.
find-and-replace across the tree, excluding IR.h itself.
also excluded IRValidation because its treatment of blocks blows up and will be
reformed in the new IR anyway.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
terser and will aid coalescing, as well as eventual transition to multidest
extracts which is what we'll actually want.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
alternative to #3638. this is theoretically better for side-by-side diffs. in
practice it may make other diffs worse since all the \'s change when part of the
macro change.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
undefined instructions are expected to return SIGILL, while implemented
instructions that aren't available in CPL-3 are expected to SIGSEGV.
Noticed this while testing out CPU-Z, it installs a kernel module and
does a bunch of `RDMSR` and `OUTS` instructions. Decided to walk through
the rest of the instructions in the `System Instruction Reference`
section.
Turns out there's a bunch of oddities in there that we don't support.
First step is to go through all the explicitl SIGILL and SIGSEGV and
implement a test for them.
Next step will be implementing the remaining operations that are
considered "System" operations but are still available in CPL-3.
This list includes:
- lar
- lgdt
- lsl
- sidt
- sldt
- stac
- clac
- verr
- verw
SRA is fundamentally about hardware registers, not stores into a
software-defined context. So, it should take a register instead of an offset.
This makes all the unaligned special cases unrepresentable (by design).
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Found out that Far Cry uses this instruction and it is viable to use in
CPL-3. This only returns constant data but its behaviour is a little
quirky.
This instruction has a weird behaviour that the 32-bit operation does an
insert in to the 64-bit destination, which might be an Intel versus AMD
behaviour. I don't have an Intel machine available to test if that
theory is true although. This assumption would match similar behaviour
where segment registers are inserted instead of zext.
Gets the game farther but then it crashes in a `___ascii_strnicmp`
function where the arguments end up being `___ascii_strnicmp(nullptr, "Color", 5);`.
There's quite a few places where the segment offset appending is open-coded
throughout the opcode dispatcher, but we can pull these out into a few
helpers to make the sites a little more compact and declarative.
Ryan Houdek