alternative to #3638. this is theoretically better for side-by-side diffs. in
practice it may make other diffs worse since all the \'s change when part of the
macro change.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
A feature of FEX's JIT is that when an unaligned atomic load/store
operation occurs, the instructions will be backpatched in to a barrier
plus a non-atomic memory instruction. This is the half-barrier technique
that still ensures correct visibility of loadstores in an unaligned
context.
The problem with this approach is that the dmb instructions are HEAVY,
because they effectively stop the world until all memory operations in
flight are visible. But it is a necessary evil since unaligned atomics
aren't a thing on ARM processors. FEAT_LSE only gives you unaligned
atomics inside of a 16-byte granularity, which doesn't match x86
behaviour of cacheline size (effectively always 64B).
This adds a new TSO option to disable the half-barrier on unaligned
atomic and instead only convert it to a regular loadstore instruction,
ommiting the half-barrier. This gives more insight in to how well a
CPU's LRCPC implementation is by not stalling on DMB instructions when
possible.
Originally implemented as a test to see if this makes Sonic Adventure 2
run full speed with TSO enabled (but all available TSO options disabled)
on NVIDIA Orin. Unfortunately this basically makes the code no longer
stall on dmb instructions and instead just showing how bad the LRCPC
implementation is, since the stalls show up on `ldapur` instructions
instead.
Tested Sonic Adventure 2 on X13s and it ran at 60FPS there without the
hack anyway.
FEXCore includes was including an FHU header which would result in
compilation failure for external projects trying to link to libFEXCore.
Moves it over to fix this, it was the only FHU usage in FEXCore/include
NFC
This is no longer necessary to be part of the public API. Moves the
header internally.
Needed to pass through `IsAddressInCodeBuffer` from CPUBackend through
the Context object, but otherwise no functional change.
Since we do an immediate overwrite of the file we are copying, we can
instead do a rename. Failure on rename is fine, will either mean the
telemetry file didn't exist initially, or some other permission error so
the telemetry will get lost regardless.
This may be useful for tracking TSO faulting when it manages to fetch
stale data. While most TSO crashes are due to nullptr dereferences, this
can still check for the corruption case.
This was a funny joke that this was here, but it is fundamentally
incompatible with what we're doing. All those users are running proot
anyway because of how broken running under termux directly is.
Just remove this from here.
This function can be unit-tested more easily, and the stack special is more
cleanly handled as a post-collection step.
There is a minor functional change: The stack special case didn't trigger
previously if the range end was within the stack mapping. This is now fixed.
Fixes an issue where TestHarnessRunner was managing to reserve the space
below stack again, resulting in stack growth breaking. Would typically
only show up when using the vixl simulator under gdb for some reason.
This is likely the last bandage on this code before it gets completely
rewritten to be more readable.
With a contended unique lock, we forgot to reset the `Expected` value to
zero. This was causing a contended mutex to incorrectly succeed.
Noticed this when converting some pthread mutexes over to spinloops to
remove strace noise.
The reference wfe_mutex library I wrote didn't have this problem since
the implementation is slightly different.
We had a chance of doing an additional bogus wfe if the expected value
was hit in one iteration of a loop. Not the biggest problem on current
hardware where WFE only ever sleeps for 1-4 system cycles, but on future
hardware where WFE might actually sleep for longer then this could have
been an issue.
Currently no functional change but public API breaks should come early.
The thread state object will be used for looking up thread specific
codebuffers in the future when we support MDWE with code mirrors.
When attempting to read files that aren't backed by a filesystem then
our current read file helpers fail since they query the file size
upfront.
Change the helper so that it doesn't query the size and just reads the file if it
can be opened. This lets us read `/proc/self/maps` using helpers.
With WOW, all allocations from 64-bit code use the full address space
and limiting is handled on the syscall thunk side so theres need to
worry about STL allocations stealing AS.
Due to Intel dropping support for legacy segment registers[1] there is a
concern that this will break legacy 32-bit software that is doing some
magic segment register handling.
Adds some simple telemetry for 32-bit applications that when they
encounter an instruction that sets the segment register or uses a
segment register that the JIT will do a /relatively/ quick four
instruction check to see if it is not a null segment.
It's not enough to just check if the segment index is 0 or not, 32-bit
Linux software starts with non-zero segment register indexes but the LDT
for each segment index is a null-descriptor.
Once the segment address is loaded, the IR operation will do a quick
check against zero and if it /isn't/ zero then set the telemetry value.
A very minor optimization that segment registers only get checked once
per block to ensure overhead stays low.
[1] https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/articles/technical/envisioning-future-simplified-architecture.html
- 3.6 - Restricted Subset of Segmentation
- `Bases are supported for FS, GS, GDT, IDT, LDT, and TSS
registers; the base for CS, DS, ES, and SS is ignored for 32-bit
mode, same as 64-bit mode (treated as zero).`
- 4.2.17 - MOV to Segment Register
- Will fault if SS is written (Breaking anything that writes to
SS).
- Will not fault if CS, DS, ES are written (Thus it sets the
segment but gets ignored due to 3.6).
It is not an external component, and it makes paths needlessly long.
Ryan seemed amenable to this when we discussed on IRC earlier.
Signed-off-by: Alyssa Rosenzweig <alyssa@rosenzweig.io>
Alyssa Rosenzweig